Making Sense of the 1980s and 1990s
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper describes and considers explanations for changes in corporate governance and merger activity in the United States since 1980. Corporate governance in the 1980s was dominated by intense merger activity distinguished by the prevalence of leveraged buyouts (LBOs) and hostility. After a brief decline in the early 1990s, substantial merger activity resumed in the second half of the decade, while LBOs and hostility did not. Instead, internal corporate governance mechanisms appear to have played a larger role in the 1990s. We conclude by considering whether these changes and the movement toward shareholder value are likely to be permanent. Bengt Holmstrom is the Paul A. Samuelson Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Steven N. Kaplan is Neubauer Family Professor of Entrepreneurship and Finance, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Both authors are also Research Associates, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
منابع مشابه
Biopharmaceutical Innovation System in China: System Evolution and Policy Transitions (Pre-1990s-2010s)
Background: This article sets up the initial discussion of the evolution of biopharmaceutical innovation in China through the perspective of sectoral innovation system (SIS).Methods: Two data sources including archival documentary data and field interviews were used in this study. Archival documentary data was collected from China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) and Chinese National Knowled...
متن کاملCorporate Governance and Merger Activity in the United States: Making Sense of the 1980s and 1990s
C orporate governance in the United States changed dramatically throughout the 1980s and 1990s. Before 1980, corporate governance—meaning the mechanisms by which corporations and their managers are governed—was relatively inactive. Then, the 1980s ushered in a large wave of merger, takeover and restructuring activity. This activity was distinguished by its use of leverage and hostility. The use...
متن کاملThe relationship between sense of power, sense of status and status seeking style with self-beneficial and other-beneficial unethical decision-making
Unethical decision making could be divided to selfish or self-benefical and other-benefical forms. The aim of this study was to investigate the differential rehationship between sense of power, sense of status and status seeking styles ( dominance and prestige) with two forms of unethical decision-making.The result of this study supported the conceptual distinction between two forms of unethica...
متن کاملDesigning and Presenting of a Model of Sense Making in Service Organizations
Organizational sense making is the process that helps managers to understand how organization's members change ideas and eventually what they chose, maintain and achieve among different meanings. �This study examines and presents a model of sense making in service organizations and results in addition to the research community in other service organizations such as municipalities and municipal ...
متن کاملرویکردی به ارزیابی سرمایه اجتماعی در اقتصاد ایران
Economic literature in 1990s notifies that the larger a nation’s social capital is, the more fortunate and wealthier the nation would be. Social capital or social part of production function is a nation’s historical heritage that aids the civil society in solving its problems through confidence factor. Civil society institutions encourage the option of cooperation strategy by means of informati...
متن کامل